On that musical and legal note, LLM, Inc. The plaintiff is seeking an accounting for any and all royalties and other monies due after March 2010 the imposition of a constructive trust on the $2 million dollars owed actual, compensatory, exemplary and punitive damages pre- and post-judgment interest and attorneys’ fees. “Instead of providing this basic information, and in blatant disregard of the process outlined in the Administration Agreement, Defendants recklessly exercised a crude form of ‘self-help’ and converted more than $2,000,000 in monies owed to the Plaintiff, most of which relates to the compositions other than ‘Let it Snow.’” In March 2013, the plaintiff initiated an attempt to audit the defendants’ books and records, but the defendants did not comply. “Defendants willfully breached the Administration Agreement and disregarded their fiduciary duties owed to the Plaintiff by favoring the interests of the Styne Estate (whose copyrights continue to be administered by Defendants) to the detriment of Plaintiff (whose administration agreement with Defendants expired in December 2011, subject to post-term obligations from Defendants to Plaintiff). When the plaintiff was informed and then requested pertinent information on this matter from the music companies, it was “stonewalled.” The suit notes that in August 2011, the Styne estate had conducted an audit of the defendants and made a claim against the same musical composition.

Since then it has become a Christmas classic, covered by a multitude of musicians.Īlleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duties and more (naughty, not nice), the Tita Cahn Trust, filed suit earlier this month against WB Music and Warner/Chappell Music.

The iconic lyricist Sammy Cahn co-wrote the song with composer Jule Styne in July 1945 during a heat wave in Los Angeles. As many of you prepare for Christmas tomorrow, allow us to wrap up the week with a crackling yuletide BLLAWG post on the lawsuit over “Let It Snow” royalties and more.

Song let it snow